Li: ritual, propriety, etiquette. Hsiao: love within the family (parents for children and children for parents. Yi: righteousness--the noblest way to act in a situation. Xin: honesty and trustworthiness. Jen: benevolence, humaneness towards others. Chung: loyalty to the state and authority. --Confucius (Kong Fuzi)
All articles appear in reverse chronological order [newest first]:
I believe the past is relevant, sometimes more than others of course. In most cases we are seeing history being repeated, so it is most relevant.

Friday, September 23, 2016

Voter registration deadlines approach.

If you haven’t registered to vote go to: http://savetheday.vote/

Indiana voters, if you need to register or if you’ve moved and need to verify that your current address is updated to your voter registration go to:  https://indianavoters.in.gov/PublicSite/Public/FT1/PublicLookupMain.aspx?Link=Registration 

Important Voter Registration Dates

  • October 11, 2016 Voter Registration Ends
  • November 8, 2016 General Election Day
  • December 1, 2016 Voter Registration Begins

NOTE: Certain military and overseas voters have extended registration periods. See http://www.in.gov/sos/elections/2673.htm for more information.

Mail-in voter registration applications must be postmarked on or before the above registration deadlines.

Saturday, September 10, 2016

The Changing Face Of Political Correctness

Political Correctness, Conventional Wisdom, My way or the Highway, Because I Said So,
are all forms of a coded message that says: "Shut up, I don't want to hear your opinion or logic..."

As in when a child says; "Daddy, why can't I stay up" and the father's response is: "Because I said so". The father didn't answer the question, he dismissed it.
Now this is an oversimplification, but you see that the father passed up the opportunity to give a useful lesson by giving a logical explanation. Of course this may be the 10th time that night the child ask the question in spite of previously receiving that logical answer, and when giving a logical answer the father is exposed to a never ending response to every explanation of "Why?". The curse of every good parent... but then, that's what parenting is all about. Nonetheless "Because I Said So' is not meant to be an answer, its meant to be a period at the end of a discussion.

Another example;

When someone says we can or can't (should or shouldn't) do something because it is politically correct or is contrary to conventional wisdom. What they are doing, consciously or subconsciously, is taking a shortcut to the end of discussion. "We shouldn't do something because it is not politically correct." is not explaining why we shouldn't do something, it is just categorizing the issue by affixing the label politically correct to it, without any certainty that all are in agreement on what is 'correct' about it. The same is true of the old fashion version of political correctness, the term conventional wisdom.

The coded message is the same. By labeling something or someone as taking a politically correct or conventional stance we are circumventing logical discussion and debate, by diminishing their opinion with the categorizing of their position as pre-defined and not deserving of further debate.

The interesting thing is that both conventional wisdom and political correctness sprung from an attempt to make discussion and debate more civil. The problem with both, and the transformation of both, is that they eventually become the status quo and at that point, while maybe offering some guidance and stability, become an opposing force to open and civil debate.

The problem today is that Political Correctness has been so misused that it is seldom applied to issues that are neither political or correct. In its time conventional wisdom served a useful purpose also, but by the 60s it too had become oppressive and widespread to the point where it was neither conventional or wisdom. The political correct movement came out of the social and political upheaval of the 60s and 70s in opposition to the outdated and oppressive conventional wisdom. Political correctness has come full circle. What comes next is a mystery.

Where Are We Now?

Over the last 20 years I don't believe that I've heard a democrat, liberal, or progressive advocate doing something because it was politically correct. The reasons they give may contain a subtext of political correctness, but they have been learning the toxicity of the phrase when it comes from them. For the most part the phrase has been the mantra of the media (avoiding a useful discussion of real facts and logic to maintain the 5 second sound-bite), conservatives, and republicans.

The toxicity of the phrase is due to the never ending demonetization of the phrase by the right-wing in attacks on any thing coming from left or the center. Every ideal, bad ideas that can be attacked on there own merits, and good ideas which can be more easily attacked with the label of political correctness. A PC attack is always easier and more effective than logic, rational, or civil discourse.

The tables have obviously turned since the 70s. Republicans now own the phrase, not just as a tool against the democrats, but also as their tool against free speech, their original point of condemnation of political correctness long before it actual became such.

The Knew Custodians Of Political Correctness, The Republicans.

po·lit·i·cal cor·rect·ness
noun
noun: political correctness; noun: political correctitude
the avoidance of forms of expression or action that are perceived to exclude, marginalize, or insult groups of people who are socially disadvantaged or discriminated against.

One of the mantras republicans and conservatives in their attacks on political correctness was that it suppressed free speech and promoted 'self-victimization', but as anyone can see victimization has become a primary practice of the republicans and conservatives.

Their constant message of the last 30 years has been the victimization of whites (the largest and most dominate political demographic in the country), Christians (the largest and most dominate religion in the country), men (particularly white men who are the most employed, best paid and politically connected gender in the country).

Convincing the majority that they are victims of the minority is an impressive feat in a democracy. That’s a special kind of paranoia.

They don't use the phrase political correctness to promote a concept they support, they use it as a pejorative, a label for demonizing a concept they oppose. They do however, practice the enforcement of their ideas through the suppression of free speech. A current case in point is the attempts to suppress the free speech of the football player who is refusing to stand for the anthem in protest. The same people who cry about political correctness being so harmful are the ones who attack him for not being politically correct. Little is said of the message of his protest, most of the right-wing rhetoric is directed at his method.
nmnmnjhHis patriotism, character, rumors of his religion are all taking presidence over the message of his protest. While they may not successfully 'shut him up', they have effectively drowned out his message with their version political correctness. The priority is to inflict on him the norms that others feel the right to inflict. Their limited explanation of patriotism is the politically correct position.

What's Next?

Conventional wisdom went full circle until it became suppressive. In overthrowing the mantra of conventional wisdom, the political correctness of the democrats went full circle until it became as suppressive as conventional wisdom, now the republican form of political correctness has reached its own suppressiveness. What form of decorum will replace it? Hope and change? Who knows.liberalvsconservative
It might come from the regrowth of the progressive movement which appears to be on the horizon. Its unlikely to come from republicans due to the dominate position of conservatives. A group that has historically opposed consideration on any enlightened position in America as far back as the progressiveness of the republican parties of Abraham Lincoln and Theodore Roosevelt. The cry of "Make America Great Again" is a step towards a return of the old conventional wisdom and practices of an oppressive and discriminating American society.

by GlennDL


see also: What is Political Correctness?

Thursday, September 8, 2016

Anniversary of the Anthrax Attacks: Sept., 18, 2001

By Glenn Littrell
reposted from 2011

On Sept. 11, 2001 terrorists hijacked four airline jets and crashed them into the World Trade Center towers in New York City, the Pentagon in Virginia and a field in rural Somerset County, Pa. There is no need to remind anyone of this event as it is ingrained in the psych of any American who was old enough to comprehend that something was different that day.
Just as with Pearl Harbor, John F. Kennedy’s assassination, Armstrong walking on the moon and the day the shuttle exploded, we all know where we were and what we were doing when those events happened. We say never forget, and we shouldn't, for these are events that define us as a nation and a people, but as time goes on the vividness of the event remains with us but our memory of surrounding events tend to fade.
Few were ever aware of the heroism and fate of the African-American cook who, untrained, manned a machine gunned and returned fire before being ordered to abandon ship at Pearl Harbor. In the case of the Kennedy assassination few remember the police officer that Lee Harvey Oswald gunned down after killing the President. How many of us can remember the name of Neil Armstrong's crew? Even less can probably name more than one member of the Challenger crew.
The events of September 11, 2001 will remain in our psyche forever, but like the other great events, the details will become items that have to be looked up in history books in order to refresh our memories. September 11, 2001, like Pearl Harbor, was not a culminating event. The two may have marked an end to a certain national innocence, but they were more significant as they marked the beginning of a new national awareness that moved the nation forward.

Just as Dorie Miller, J.D. Tippit, Buzz Aldrin do not leap out of our memories in a flash, neither does Thomas Morris or Joseph Curseen.

Every September since 2001 our national attention appropriately turns to memorializing the victims of 9/11. While this attention is totally justified it is ironic that what was perceived as the biggest threat to the nation during the days that followed the attacks was the fear of bio-terrorism. Anthrax to be exact.
On the day of the 9/11 attacks Vice President Cheney and his staff were given CIPRO as a precaution against Anthrax. This was before the anthrax was placed in the mail system and anyone had been exposed. The first letters containing anthrax would not be mailed for about a week. Once the anthrax letters started showing up and as long as the public thought the anthrax attacks were connected to the 9/11 attacks it was the countries greatest fear.
After 17 infections, including 5 deaths, the attention turned from the anthrax attacks as time passed. The letters ceased and the realization that the attacks were probably domestic in nature and not tied to the 9/11 attacks pushed the anthrax attacks from our public discussion and our collective memory.

bwLDP~02~397 b
In 2002 the Indianapolis Area Local made a giant postcard that we took around the state that year collecting signatures in support of the Postal Workers at the processing plant where the two Postal Workers had died.

As little as a year later, on the anniversary of the 9/11 attacks, then IAL-President Eddie Beaver and I manned a booth on the Circle during the cities first 9/11 Community Fair passing out fliers about the steadfastness of Postal Workers during the anthrax attacks. We were astonished how many people were surprised to be reminded about the anthrax attacks. Most people had forgotten about anthrax or had absorbed those events into the whole Islamic terrorism memory of 9/11.

As postal workers we can take pride in our diligence and commitment during that hectic year. 
 

Morris-sm image

So on this the anniversary of both the 9/11 attacks and the anthrax attacks let's remember both events. Let's remember the two Postal Workers that died from anthrax exposure: Joseph Curseen and Thomas Morris (brother of Cumberland Window Clerk Sheila Howard) and let's remember how as we came to work every day we were the first responders to the anthrax attacks.

THE CREED

"Neither snow, nor rain, nor heat, nor gloom of night stays these couriers from the swift completion of their appointed rounds"
APlan

Since the establishment of Postal Service in 1775 by the Second Continental Congress, Postal Workers have routinely been  placed in harms way:

  • Exposed to the hazards of frontier life and armed robberies from the early Colonial "Post Riders" to the experimental Railway Mail Service of 1862. 
  • From the brief but dangerous existence of the Pony Express, exemplified by the newspaper recruitment advertisements that read "Wanted: Young, skinny,     wiry fellows not over 18. Must be expert riders willing to risk death daily. Orphans preferred."  
  • From the death of the three American "Sea Post Clerks" in service aboard the HMS Titanic in 1912 and more through two World Wars. 
  • From the early days of aviation and the experimental testing of mail delivery by air to the modern day "Unabomber".  
With the death of Postal Workers Thomas Morris, Jr. and Joseph Curseen, Postal Workers entered the age of bio-terrorism. In 2001 Postal Workers across the country demonstrated that the creed is more than an outdated reference to their duties. It exemplifies the dedication of Postal Workers to their work, the sanctity of their duties, and the significance of the U.S. Mail to the history and security of the country.


IALAPWU Annual Picnic 2002
We collected over 3000 signatures and turned the Post Card over to Rep. Julia Carson to deliver to the Brentwood Area Local in Washington.

IALAPWU Annual Picnic 2002 
Former IAL#130 President and current Regional Coordinator Sharon Stone, former IAL#130 President Eddie Beaver, the Late Congresswoman Julia Carson and Cumberland window clerk Sheila Howard at the 2002 Annual Picnic.

When the country was paralyzed by the events of September 11, 2001 and horrified by the subsequent anthrax attacks, Postal Workers continued in their duties without missing a beat. When Congress closed its doors because of the delivery of anthrax laden mail, the Postal Workers that delivered and processed that mail did not cower in their duties. When it was discovered that materials from contaminated postal facilities where delivered to the Critical Parts Center in Indianapolis, the 'non-postal' facility was immediately closed down. Indianapolis Postal Workers at the facilities and offices that delivered that material continued to perform their duties without interruption. With 20 postal facilities testing positive for anthrax contamination, Postal Workers in overwhelming numbers continued to report for work, well aware of the potential dangers.

Postal Workers across America continue to display a dedication to their daily duties that is only surpassed by the members of our Armed Forces and our unionized brothers and sisters in Police and Fire Departments across the country and unmatched in the private sector.

 Timeline Of The Attacks

  • Sept. 18, 2001: The first letters containing anthrax are mailed.
  • Oct. 4, 2001: Bob Stevens of American Media in Florida is hospitalized with inhalation anthrax.
  • Oct. 5, 2001: Stevens, 63, dies.
  • Oct. 8, 2001: Anthrax is found in the Boca Raton, Fla., The building is closed.
  • Oct. 9, 2001: More letters laced with anthrax are mailed.
  • Oct. 12, 2001: An NBC employee in New York City tests positive for anthrax poisoning.
  • October 15: A letter to Senator Daschle is opened. The anthrax in the letter was described as a "fine, light tan powder" which easily flew into the air.
  • Oct. 16, 2001: The 7-month-old son of an ABC News freelance producer tests positive for anthrax poisoning.
  • Oct. 18, 2001: A CBS employee and a New Jersey postal worker test positive for anthrax poisoning.
  • Oct. 23, 2001: Two postal workers from the Brentwood facility in Washington, D.C., are confirmed to have died from inhalation anthrax.
  • Oct. 26, 2001: A U.S. State Department mail room staffer is hospitalized with anthrax poisoning.
  • Oct. 28, 2001: A Anthraxrewardsecond New Jersey postal employee tests positive for anthrax poisoning.
  • Oct. 30, 2001: A New Jersey patient is reported with anthrax poisoning.
  • Oct. 31, 2001: A hospital employee in Manhattan, dies from inhalation anthrax.
  • Nov. 21, 2001: Ottilie Lundgren, 94, of Connecticut, dies from inhalation anthrax. Dec. 2003: After more than $130 million worth of renovation and cleanup the Brentwood postal facility reopens in Washington, D.C..
  • July 29, 2008: Bruce E. Ivins, the second government scientist suspected in the 2001 anthrax attacks, commits suicide.
  • Feb. 19, 2010: The FBI, Department of Justice, and the U.S. Postal Inspection Service formally conclude their investigations of the anthrax mailings. According to the DOJ report: "Evidence developed from [the] investigation established that Dr. [Bruce] Ivins, alone, mailed the anthrax letters."
  • Feb. 15, 2011: A group of independent scientists convened by the National Academies of Sciences  concludes that scientific evidence is consistent with the idea that Bruce Ivins could have been the perpetrator of the anthrax attacks that killed five people in 2001. But taken on its own, the science doesn't prove Ivins did it, the panel says. The new report is limited to an evaluation of the scientific evidence and does not assess the guilt or innocence of anyone connected to the case.

Sources:

79