Li: ritual, propriety, etiquette. Hsiao: love within the family (parents for children and children for parents. Yi: righteousness--the noblest way to act in a situation. Xin: honesty and trustworthiness. Jen: benevolence, humaneness towards others. Chung: loyalty to the state and authority. --Confucius (Kong Fuzi)

All articles appear in reverse chronological order [newest first].

Post from FaceBook may not be viewable if not signed into FaceBook.
I believe the past is relevant, sometimes more than others of course. In most cases we are seeing history being repeated, so it is most relevant.
Showing posts with label Civility. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Civility. Show all posts

Sunday, September 11, 2022

THE CHRISTIAN LEFT: YES, WE EXIST.

 We must stop looking to the government to make America a Christian utopia. Our kingdom is not of this world.


We must abandon all thoughts of fixing others and let Jesus fix us.
If we want the sanctity of marriage then stop cheating, stop having affairs, stop looking at porn, and stop getting divorced. That is the way for the church to stand up for the biblical definition of marriage, not by someone martyring their self-righteous self.

Thursday, December 2, 2021

Posting on Facebook:

 When you post something on your timeline your privacy and sharing settings control who can see it and depending on your settings your post appears on other people's wall. So remember when people respond and comment it's not 'just a case of them going to your timeline and being nosy... YOU shared it!

But isn't that what we do on Facebook? It's like being in a room of people and you stand up and say something, don't other people in the room have a right to do the same? Even respond?

Facebook is a big room. You can control who comes into your room with privacy controls and by limiting your friends' list, but if you want something to be private... don't say it in a room of people.

GlennDL
2016

Saturday, February 20, 2021

YES!! It Was An Insurrection.

I don't know what you saw, but I saw:

Protestors flinging projectiles at police.

Protestors beating, shoving, and insulting police.

Protestors breaking windows and vandalizing property.

I heard threats of violence, death, and anarchy.

Protesters dragging the American flag across the floor of congress.*

Protesters wearing the flag like a blanket.*

Protesters using the flag and its staff as a weapon.*

The American flag heaped on someone's desk.*

American flags defaced with slogans, pictures, and discoloration.*

Few arrests.

Violence should always face consequences.

I never heard anyone explain any reasoning for the violent attack on our government other than those based on unproven lies and conspiracy. 

All references to the protestors' object or goal were expressed as destruction, injury, and overthrow.

To paraphrase critiques of attempts over the summer to raise awareness of rampant social injustices: "What sense does it make to vandalize their own neighborhood," substitute the word government for the word neighborhood. 

Did any of the speakers at the protest discourage violence, did they discuss how to proceed peacefully and legally? 

Where was the militarized law enforcement that was present at the June 1, 2020, Lafayette Park protest that saw peaceful protestors run over and gassed so that the President could have a photo op?

How many of those protestors (and their defenders) that stormed the Capitol were harsh critics of peaceful protestors over the summer? Where is the outrage from the so-called 'family values' law and order conservatives? They were outraged by a passive protest at football games and the disruption of traffic patterns at other peaceful protests but silent on armed attacks on the government and our constitutional principles.

The hypocrisy of the right-wing/conservative Republican'ts is never more obvious than when they express their self-serving views on patriotism and, in particular, when they claim their views on the American flag. They condemn protestors who do not follow their rigid view of the pledge of allegiance and the national anthem. Failure to stand or recite the pledge is vilified by them, but they're OK with improper display of the flag when they are doing so. They cringe and nash their teeth at any criticism of the anthem's words but don't even know the second and third verses. They condemn people who don't wave the flag and beat their chest in echoing their brand of patriotism but consider it OK to deface the flag with images, colors, and slogans that support their political views. Yet they condemn a man who chooses to kneel (a historical sign of respect) instead of stand during the anthem.

Flag desecration and proper protocols are laid out in the 4 U.S. Code § 8.Respect for the flag but it is not law; it is not enforceable by any degree other than society's level of acceptance. We are all free to accept it as protocol or reject it, but if you reject it, then what are the rules concerning 'respect' for the flag? 

That, obviously, is where the right-wing nationalist are: they feel they have the right to decide what patriotism is, what the proper respect for the flag is, what is right for the country. It is what they say it is. They are like the bully on the playground... his rules. 

The Bully in Chief 


Incited by the Bully in Chief and with the limited attitude of a mob, that is what they chose to do on January 6, 2021; takeover with no real objective other than violence, destruction, and bodily harm.

The June 1, 2020, Lafayette Park protest and the January 6, 2021 insurrection at the Capitol graphically demonstrate the divisive, illegitimate, and chaotic nature of Donald Trump's presidency and aspirations. 

GlennDL

Opinion: Political extremes hijack national symbols

*All of the items followed by the "*" are listed as disrespectful and desecration of the flag under the US Flag Code, but the so-called patriots" have little understanding of either our constitution or the flag code. The irony is that these same "patriots" probably are among those who skewered a black athlete who chose to kneel, a gesture which has never been viewed as a sign of disrespect in history, instead of standing.

Picture: By The White House from Washington, DC - President Trump Visits St. John's Episcopal Church, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=90897698

FB-13 TW-

Monday, January 18, 2021

The Role Of Fearful Rhetoric

UPDATED: 1-18-21
ORIGINALLY POSTED: 7-11-2012
by Glenn Littrell:
Remember the 2011 assassination attempt of Gabrielle Gifford that saw 6 people killed and 18 others shot in Arizona?
The call to violence did not start with the January 6, 2021 riots; it didn't even start with Donald Trump; Trump only saw an opportunity to capitalize on the intolerant and violent tendency of the Republican Party leadership and the delusion of right-wing extremists, to his advantage.
This is why he only became a Republican when he announced his candidacy. He saw that their fringe element was more volatile than the extremists of the left. He knew that by putting forth a populist message, he could co-opt the disenfranchised right and draw off some votes from the equally disenfranchised left once their champion (Bernie Sanders) was eliminated. He knew the Republican base would follow any candidate once chosen.
His simplest task was to bully the Republican candidates into irrelevance.
He never thought it would be so easy.
When he succeeded, he never expected to beat his former friend Hillary. His plan was to gin up the next big moneymaking scheme with a simple "all publicity is good publicity" scam that faded into oblivion when, to his astonishment, he won.
That is how we got a president totally unaware of how politics, government, the constitution, and democracy worked—an ego-driven, bullying, insecure con-man.
jkelly
When you use fear or hate to motivate people to act you are pushing them to act in a manner that might be less than rational. Fear and hate are emotions, and emotions often lead to irrational thought processes and actions. When you include rhetoric that is less than truthful, peppered with innuendo, or dependent on misinformation or faulty conclusions you loose control of your message, allowing it to be co-opted by those that might be inclined towards your position but with a level of emotion that keeps the proper perspective, your more focused and more objective prospective, from being held in check by rational thought. The end result is that those you may have influence on, who look to you for leadership, may not always pickup on your sarcasm, irony, or other forms of making a point as being subtle wordplay. Because you have them on the edge of their emotional chair hanging on to every fear laden word you utter they may see your references like 'second amendment remedies' as anything but subtle.
This 'Upcoming Event' with Jesse Kelly may not have been intended to suggest violence against his opponent by a rational person, but Mr Kelly was running for Congress, a leadership position. Whatever his point was with this event, campaigning on messages that provoke emotions tends to expose his point to a wide spectrum of interpretations. Palin with rifle cross-hairs on her political 'targets', "don't retreat, reload" , Beck with his inflammatory references to Stalin, Hitler, etc., O'Rielly with his Islamaphobic characterizations, Bachman with her Democrats are anti-American and should be investigated, Limbaugh with his spineless rhetoric, and so forth and so forth.
Now look at Mr. Kelly's "Upcoming Event" and tell me what its all about!
How many times have we had to hear about how anti-America Obama is based on 'connecting the dots' or vague 'patterns of behavior' as proof from the above mentioned idiots. Well let's play connect the dots with the above demagogues and this "Upcoming Event" and the other references above and below!!!!!!
“Anyone who has the power to make you believe absurdities has the power to make you commit injustices.”  Voltaire
palin

Unfortunately the right wing is going to spin this atrocity away from their doorstep. They'll ignore their own claims that hateful Islamic rhetoric caused the Ft. Hood tragedy and chalk this shooting up to just another wacko.
There should be little doubt that whether this guy is associated with right wing hate groups, or even turns out to be a left wing wacko, or someone who came to his delusion without ever seeing FOXNews or hearing Rush, he did not live in a vacuum.
If he was anti-Rush, or a disillusioned liberal, he may have seen the right wing’s cries for violence as a threat to himself; if he was a right-wing fan who believed the claims of death panels he may have feared for his elderly grandparents; if he never watched TV, listened to the radio, or went on the internet he may have been exposed to hateful rhetoric, unfiltered by anyone outside of his little circle of friends.
I don't believe that Rush, Sarah or O'Rielly can talk anyone into murder, but I believe people who are in a position of leadership, influence or authority can scare people into over reacting out of fear and hate.  Rush, Sarah and others make millions of dollars influencing people. Their stations charge millions of dollars to sponsors that know just being associated with their shows can result in increased sales. Marketing/advertising is a billion dollar business based on influencing and directing people daily.
When their self-righteous fear-mongering stirs up mob mentalities [Tea Party] then they share the blame.
They raised cane when Obama used the word 'enemy' in a speech and cried racism when he used a 'back of the car' reference, but they routinely hurl words like socialist, target, anti-american, Christian, whatever, 'take out Harry Ried', reload, second amendment remedies, etc., etc.
This incident is going to do little to make them back-off the hateful rhetoric, its too valuable to them, they'll rationalize this away and then things will be worse not better. This incident will be the greater divide not a wake-up call.

After the Arizona shootings a spokesperson for Palin tried to say the ‘bulls eye s’ were not gun sights but ‘surveyor pins’.
But in the screen capture [right] of a Palin Tweet she refers to the graphic and the “bulls eye icon” herself.
PalinBullseye
We can’t shout fire in crowded theater for a reason. It is ill-advised to do so even when there is a real threat of fire. The reason is not because a warning isn’t important because it is, but how we alert the crowd to the fire is important to how they react to it. Rational people will react in an orderly manner, will access the situation and keep their heads, allowing for an orderly exit. Some people, perhaps less rational or prone to panic, may become anxious and panic. I think that we can all agree that how we deliver the message may determine the level of panic. To shout fire nearly guarantees that the few who might panic will and their panic becomes contagious. On the other hand a hurried but controlled announcement may keep the majority calm and the ones likely to panic may find the lack of panic in the majority calming.
tu
NOTE 3: 1-13-2011 More examples of Fearful Rhetoric are listed on the ‘part 2’ post of this article. All future updates will be posted to the ‘comments’ section there [TOTW: Other Examples Of Fearful Rhetoric]. Feel free to post your own comments here or on Facebook. Comments are not moderated before showing, but they are reviewed for civility. Please do not use the ‘Anonymous’ option, use the ‘Name/URL” option with a nickname if you wish to remain anonymous. This will allow responses to you in the comments section to not be confused with anyone else. Thank you:                                 GlennDL.
For full text of Robert Kennedy’s speech “Mindless Menace Of Violence” click here.
242 / 254

Tuesday, January 12, 2021

17 Things we didn't hear about in 2020 because they weren't connected to COVID-19 or Trump:

1. We almost started World War III

2. Mr. Peanut was killed off, then reincarnated as Baby Nut

3. The weather went wild

4. A man named Deval Patrick ran for president

5. Bob Dylan released a 17-minute song about the JFK assassination

6. The Defense Department shared bona fide UFO videos

7. Murder hornets invaded the U.S.

by Jeva Lange

8. Grimes and Elon Musk named their baby X Æ A-12

9. NASA detected a parallel universe in Antarctica where time runs backward, or something?

10. SpaceX launched astronauts into space, sadly left all of us behind

11. A gigantic star 2 million times brighter than the sun just up and … disappeared

12. Kanye West announced he was running for president

13. A bunch of people planted mystery seeds from China, despite that obviously being a bad idea

14. We may have discovered the first proof of extraterrestrial life

15. Wormholes might not kill you!

16. Kellyanne Conway's 15-year-old daughter broke a major news story by telling on her mom

17. Please do not feed the monoliths

from: 17 things you've already forgotten happened in 2020
by Jeva Lange

Monday, December 14, 2020

The War On Christmas: Why I say "Happy Holidays"

 I’ve had it, yes I have had it. The commercialization of Christmas by corporate America, the lack of tolerance and compassion by so-called Christians, the exploitation of Christmas by so-called religious leaders, their mega-churches, political war chest and TV empires.  It baffles me that people seek to define the presence of God in symbols, the presence or absence of Christ in a word, the proof of devotion in tithes, and the identification of worthiness by the choice of political party.

I have no problem with boycotting a corporations product or services based on their practices or policies, but to identify a company as worthy because they prominently portray the word Christmas and unfavorable because they don’t, while at the same time ignoring their policies that encourage third world wages, unsafe working conditions, the use of child labor, and the export of jobs to COMMUNIST nations is so far from responsible it is mind boggling.

The so-called “War on Christmas” is a political hoax:

clip_image001Let me start by saying that if you believe that someone with different political view than yours is evil, or un-American then you probably don’t want to read on.
If you believe that because 86% of the country claims to be Christian that makes us a Christian nation, but at the same time you believe that the remaining 13% are oppressing Christians in this country, then you probably don’t want to read on.

…but, you might want to look at how Christian churches in China have to operate “…within the narrow boundaries of theology and church life dictated by the State Administration for Religious Affairs,…”, or how Christians have been persecuted, oppressed, tortured and killed in the former Soviet Union, modern North Korea, and the middle east. These are places where Christianity is persecuted and oppressed, in America what passes for oppression is little more than differences of opinion about religious choice, the right to practice and the right to refrain.

clip_image001

If your not outraged by the commercialization of Christ and Christmas how can you be upset about someone choosing between “Happy Holidays” or “Merry Christmas”?

War On Christmas 2015

image_thumb[2]This year the first shot of the 2015 was fired before Thanksgiving. Ironically, or maybe not so ironically, the ‘war’, like the commercialization of Christmas is starting earlier each year.

The following comes from a Facebook discussion:·

WAR ON CHRISTMAS?

clip_image001[4]I was reading this morning about how the new Starbucks holiday cups are the first strike in this years' war on Christmas.

May I say something as a Christian pastor? The message of Christmas is already lost on much of the church whether or not the season has "Merry Christmas" stamped on it. At this point, the birth of a poor child in the cold darkness is celebrated by lights, glaring music and by the biggest shopping season of the year. Nothing could silence the message of Christmas more than how it is already celebrated.

Let's be clear, if the spirit of Christmas is under attack this year, it is by capitalism which has turned the holiday into a commodity like it does everything else; and by selfish Christians who refuse to to obey Jesus' command to be a good neighbor to those who walk different paths.

As we wander through the mockeries of this holiday season, this Christian is lifting a holiday cup to honor my atheist, Jewish, Muslim, pagan as well as Christian neighbors who share the same hope of "peace on earth and goodwill to all."

Jim Rigby    https://www.facebook.com/jim.rigby.12/about


10 Things Christians Shouldn’t Do At Christmas

142/171 / 220

Tuesday, December 8, 2020

BookMark Dump of Known Resources(links):

Research & Fact Checks:



FlackCheck.org – A project of Annenberg Classroom
Lead Stories
8 ways to connect with PolitiFact
Debunking False Stories Archives - FactCheck.org
Global Warming and Climate Change skepticism examined
OpenSecrets Blog - Breaking news, original reporting, and investigative journalism *on money in politics from the Center for Responsive Politics
Fact Checker - The Washington Post
Homework Help, Dictionary, Encyclopedia, and Online Almanac | Fact Monster
FactCheck.org - A Project of The Annenberg Public Policy Center
Facts and Myths Regarding Trending Topics - Fact and Myth
Urban Legends
What's New | Snopes.com
Fact-checking pundits | PunditFact
Fact-checking U.S. politics | PolitiFact
Politics That Work (lib??)
Latest Email Hoaxes - Current Internet Scams - Hoax-Slayer
Media Bias/Fact Check - Search and Learn the Bias of News Media
POLITICUSUSA
The Nazis were not socialists - Full Fact
Our team | Africa Check
FactCheck.org | Facebook
memeorandum

Fake & Misleading News Sites

NFL: Trump Is Delusional Or Lying, Releases Statement Correcting The President
Empire News
Weekly World News | The World's Only Reliable News
Home - Baltimore Gazette
Conservative Tribune Fearless, Bold, Conservative.
The Onion - America’s Finest News Source
DISCLAIMER
Verified Politics
Find related images with reverse image search - Android - Google Search Help

Sunday, July 12, 2020

SUNDAY MEMES:





The middle class is made up of working families, modern America was built by the middle class and the middle class was made possible by The New Deal, the GI Bill, and Unions.

Monday, June 22, 2020

Mike Pence: Saying "All lives matter " so he won't have to say "Black lives matter. "

If this was a conference on abortion, he would have no problem saying the lives of all unborn fetuses matter.
Or at the memorial for a fallen soldier, he would have no problem saying the lives of all soldiers matter.
Or at the funeral for a fallen Police officer, he would have no problem saying blue lives matter.
So why can't he say black lives matter?
When someone says "...lives of all unborn fetuses matter" that doesn't mean they care less about other lives. Pence wouldn't respond to that declaration by clarifying "...all lives matter."
He can't say black lives matter because that would offend the extreme right-wing of his party base.
A simple acknowledgment of the importance of one group as part of a  larger group or another group does not automatically diminish any group.
Image may contain: text that says 'Do you believe that All Lives Matter' so you don't have to acknowledge that 'Black Lives Matter' too? w.pkasitirskang'

Search This Blog